Compare and Contrast Baz Luhrmanns dramatisation of Romeo and Juliet, Act 2, Scene 2 with Franco Zeffirellis version Essay Example

Compare and Contrast Baz Luhrmanns dramatisation of Romeo and Juliet, Act 2, Scene 2 with Franco Zeffirellis version Essay In Baz Luhrmanns dramatisation, he breaks away from the traditional style of Romeo and Juliet and does a more modern, thrilling interpretation of the play.He tries to incorporate every day modern life issues to make the film more exciting, for example the scene with Mercutio as a transvestite, and how Romeo takes drugs before the Capulet party.Zeffirellis version on the other hand has a completely different approach; it has more of a traditional Shakespeare style that all his plays are performed under. It is in Elizabethan times and is more true to the text than the Baz Luhrmann version.Luhrmanns characters are considerably changed from the traditional Shakespeare versions, here they are older than in the book, they are both at around 17 to 18 years old, and their knowledge is shown along with it, they seem to know more on sexual areas unlike Zeffirellis:Or any other part belonging to a manThis is from Act two, Scene two where Juliet says this in a humorous manner as she is thinking of what this could be. All the characters in this version wear modern outfits, e.g. Mercutios costume, and Pariss space suit. The only characters not in modern clothing are Romeo and Juliet; Romeo in Knights armour and Juliet as an Angel.Zeffirellis characters are all dressed in traditional Shakespearian dress, the women in formal gowns and dress, and the men in tights. Juliet is wearing a revealing vibrant red dress making her stand out from all the other women who are dressed in beige or darker colours. Romeo on the other hand is dressed in quite usual clothing for that time. Romeo and Juliet are much younger in this text; Juliet is very innocent looking and they both act clumsier. In Baz Luhrmanns production Romeo and Juliet seem to be aware of what they are doing throughout, but in Zeffirellis they stumble about and seem more lost in passion. An example of this is when Romeo stumbles out of the bushes into the courtyard to call to Juliet.The entrance hall in Zeffirellis version is very traditional of that day and age; a red brick hall, this and the torches and pillars in the room, give it a very medieval feel. The orchard scene is set very classically, with high orchard walls and balcony. Baz Luhrmanns version is very different from this as it has an extremely stylish look to the hall with that party in, more impressive architecture, in a 20th century building. The balcony scene here is replaced by the swimming pool scene which is very original and is giving a new modern concept away from Shakespeares classic balcony scene.The meeting of Romeo is very differently done in both versions. Zeffirellis scene shows Romeo in the party dancing when he sees Juliet from across the hall, and this is shot from his perspective. As the next dance comes on, they spin around in a circle giving the impression that they are lost in each others love. After this is over, a sonnet comes on stage and the camera follows Romeo making his way over to Juliet. The sonnet is singing a piece foreseeing the future of the play, about the falling in love and death of a couple, giving the audience an idea of what is to come.In the Baz Luhrmann version we see a completely different approach to this. After taking drugs, Romeo goes out of control and we see him in the bathroom putting his face in a basin of water. He then looks in the fish tank, and suddenly sees Juliet through it, giving the scene a flirting romantic sense.In Zeffirellis version of the play he shoots it from Romeos perspective throughout the scene. In Baz Luhrmanns adaptation he manages to keep it on both their perspectives. In the beginning it is all in Romeos perspective up until the bathroom scene where it has it in her perspective with her leading him on, and being led away by her parents. He uses modern camera effects like blurring and uses abstract positioning of the camera to get the more unusual shots e.g. seeing Romeo with his head in the basin of water. Zeffirelli uses conventional methods b ut uses perspective for Romeo for a lot of the shots; the others are still set or tracking the person in scene.One of the most significant scenes in both adaptations is the Romeo and Juliet balcony scene or scene 3. Here Baz Luhrmann creates a scene where they are reborn by the water, relating to baptism. There crazy love is shown in the spinning of them in the pool, lost in there own love. The scene is passionate and uses perspective shots on both characters. As they progress Luhrmann gets a security guard to come out, showing they will risk death for each others love in a less obvious way.When they decide they will be wedded Luhrmann creates a new part, where Juliet hands Romeo a silver cross, to show Juliets playing role as in other adaptations such as Zeffirellis where Romeos role is put at a greater concentration than hers.Zeffirellis depiction of this scene is a classic balcony scene, high old walls, a clearing, and a balcony. This scene is shot from his perspective; looking u p at Juliet Zeffirelli makes Juliet look very innocent by her huddled on the wall. Keeping to the text and the original age. Zeffirelli shows Romeos youth by making him talk an act very rash. In an over excited fashion he stumbles out of the place where he was listening to Juliet, showing he is not yet matured as all he has done so far was considered very ungentlemanly like.As they talk, Romeo climbs up a tree next to the balcony to get closer to Juliet, this is Zeffirelli showing us how love lust he is, climbing a tree late at night to reach her. Unlike Luhrmans there love is more immature, there conversation is more rushed and seems less though through unlike the older characters in Luhrmanns adaptation. As the scene ends, they have stayed with each other all night. As Romeo leaves Zeffirelli gets them to do the reach where David reaches out to god, showing there contact with each other.Luhrmanns modern adaptation is showing a side of Shakespeare that is not always seen, and it is assumed that it was originally performed as to the style in Zeffirellis. Zeffirellis is a more traditional timed one, true to text and shows a more classic approach to Romeo and Juliet giving the audience a passionate classic, Luhrmans is offering a more original picture. Luhrmans and Zeffirellis are two completely different approaches of successfully showing play Romeo and Juliet.

Gangs as a social essays

Gangs as a social essays In the pass 25 years, the migration of gangs have been a big problem in the United States and all over the world. 190 larger cities with the population of more than one hundred thousand and 555 smaller cities said they have notice some gang migration in there city in the pass 5 years. The reason why gangs migrate, is because they are being watched by law enforcement and in order for the gang to go on they migrate to smaller suburb type cities to recruit young kids that fill like they have nothing going for themselves or their not getting any attention at home. Female gang migrations are very uncommon, as well as Asian and White gangs. About half the cities reported that at least 60 percent of their migrations were black, 28 percent were Hispanic (juvenile justice bulletin October, 1998). Where are the places of origin of gang migration? Cities within the Los Angeles area were cited by 63 percent of the respondents. 1/3 mentioned Chicago area cites with fare fewer reporting New York a nd Detroit areas. About  ¼ cited the city of Los Angeles (rather than the larger Los Angeles area) as their primary source of migrants, Chicago was noted by 14 percent. Gangs primary source of migration was typically within 100 miles of the gang infested cities. Only 12 percent cited that the gangs have moved more than 1,000 miles away. A regional migration pattern, or a clustering of three or more source cities within 30 miles of each other, was evident in about  ¼ of all cites(www.ojjdp.nejrs.org). In order to stop gang migration the community has to step in and take a stand. Creating activities for children not to get involve or hire police to do community watch. Until the communities get involved than gangs will continue to make society a living hell. The history of gangs has been in existence for as long as there have been inhabitants of this world. The word thug dates back to India in the year 1200 AD and it refers to a gang of criminals ...

Assignment 4 women psy Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

Assignment 4 women psy - Essay Example Feminists were serious in proving their arguments. Meta-analytical researches were done. Such researches yielded a variety of results and explanations. In some experiments where subjects were informed that the tests they will take were either gender-fair or not, subjects would usually perform in accordance to their pre-conceived notions about the test. One example is Spencer’s experiment on the differences in math abilities of males and females. College students of equivalent math backgrounds took math tests. Half were told that the math test showed gender differences in the past and half were told that the test has been shown to be gender fair. As expected, among those who believed that the test was gender fair, there were no gender differences in performance, however, with those who believed it showed gender differences, women under-performed compared to men. This may be explained that stereotypes about women faring less than men in mathematics may have affected their perfor mance. Such researches imply that stereotypes have the power to dictate how people may behave in certain situations. At the same time, it may be used as an excuse whenever people fail or succeed at one point or another, lessening accountability on the person himself. In the case of the experiment discussed, women may use the stereotype that they are weaker in math whenever they encounter difficult math problems. There are some theories that gender differences may spring from a biological reason, that males are differently wired from females, that they might have more hormones that may trigger aggressive tendencies and other stereotyped behaviors for males. Other theories attribute gender differences in social learning, that boys and girls behave the way they do because they have been trained as society expects them to- that girls are â€Å"sugar and spice and everything nice† and boys